To: The Rittenhouse Review
From: Richard Ames [ Semarla@cs.com ]
Date: November 26, 2002
You wrote regarding your blackballing of LGF the following: >>>the site’s unwillingness to tolerate comments that deviate from the house line and its active and aggressive deletion of comments from readers that it deems objectionable -- and the “bright line” test involved is almost totalitarian in nature and scope -- is nothing less than a disgrace.<<<
Well, are you not now “unwilling to tolerate comments that deviate from the house line.”? Hey, if you don’t agree with him, challenge him. But please don’t start censoring.
Signed,
Richard Ames
Pittsburgh
Jim Capozzola of The Rittenhouse Review responds:
I made my position clear with respect to LGF on Friday, November 22. If that post did not, in your mind, constitute a “challenge,” I assure you that LGF and its allies have interpreted it to be exactly that.
I am censoring no one, not even LGF. I have not visited LGF since last week, so I cannot say this with absolute certainty, but I suspect LGF has continued to publish since November 22 just as it did before.
Moreover, I hope the links to the nearly 600 publications from the U.S. and abroad, ranging in perspective from far left to far right, to which The Rittenhouse Review has linked under its blogroll will persuade you, if only slightly, that I have no intention of standing in the way of the free flow of information.